Exactly one year ago, 28 of us were hopeful high school students, coming to Jean Monnet for the first time as candidates to the first GED Admission Auditions ever.
On Saturday, May the 20th 2017 the second edition of this admission day took place.
The previous team in charge of the organization had done a really good job, making the day a real success. Since the bar had been set so high, the main question was the following one: how could we welcome our future fellow students even better?
The task was given to a group of 2nd year students, led by Hortense Derrien (Ariane Edery, Blandine d’Humières, Flora Merret, Nina Ravine). Two first year students were added to this team (Mathis Aubry-Lallement, Claire-Emeline Auduc). All of them were granted the advice of the original team (Adrien Aing, Julien Blavot Goujon, Erwann Le Noac’h, Wassim Mokadem). This way, we could pursue what had already been accomplished last year. In addition, we were taking into account the former candidates’ ideas and remarks.
We started by making a clear list of what had to be done and how the day would be organized. Professor Magnier had selected the students who were to be auditioned from APB and we had to contact them and organize the auditions. Just like last year, the admission would be decided upon 2 auditions. One occurred in front of a “little” jury made of students whereas the other, more formal, was compounded of alumni and teachers. We were glad a lot of former GED students accepted to come. The grand jury was carried out by Pierre Delassis, representing the alumni.
Elaborating a running order required the exchange of several emails with the candidates because it often depended on their availabilities. The team took the time to make it perfect, which was necessary because we wanted to avoid any delay which would have jeopardized our all organization.
Sticking to the timetable was the main demand made by the GED1. Indeed, our goal for this year was basically to take the basis of last year work but with a little more organization.
Once we had the GED1’ opinions, we knew what was to be improved. For example, the “pre-coaching” set to put the candidates in the mood by explaining a few things before the actual auditions had to be kept because of how helpful it had been the previous year. We also decided to define roles for every student to occupy during the day: welcome the students, pre-coaching, visits, digital team, juries, bake sales… A major improvement was also the room specifically arranged to welcome the parents. GED students were always there to answer questions or simply discuss with them, which was appreciated.
Most of the parents appreciated the fact that they learnt about the course thanks to the talks given by Maitre Baller and Pierre Delassis in the amphitheater, and that they could also speak directly with the students.
[…] Once arrived, I was amazed by the great organization and most importantly by the kindness and helpfulness of the students. Answering all our questions, and really concerned about how it went. […] I also considered the exchange with the members of the jury as an instructive experience and fruitful discussion regarding the future of the course and what we can personally bring to it. In conclusion, it attracted me even more and confirmed me into thinking this is what I want to do later.
A candidate to the Grande Ecole du Droit.
GED1 students discussing with candidates in the pre-coaching room.
© Ghislena Ly/ Audrey Ailloud
Another point we put a lot of thoughts in was the bake cake. Last year, a lunch had been prepared but not everyone was aware of it and it was somehow served a little late. This year, we decided to have everyone participate in the sale. In addition, the team made sandwiches in the morning. Almost everything was sold out and the remaining sandwiches were given to homeless people in the evening.
Among the different roles we had defined, one consisted in waiting at the station to guide the candidates towards the university. But we soon realized it was useless, the families being already informed thanks to the signs we had put the day before. It was satisfying to see we had thought of everything, even though it seemed excessive sometimes. The goal for next year is thus to find a balance to make the day even more dynamic.
As part of the creation of the “Journée des Oraux” in 2016, I was offered another chance to help find out the GED 1 of tomorrow thanks to my presence in the Selection Juries. Hence, I felt glad and very pleased to see that the big project my teammates and I left incomplete evolved into something really amazing, something that made our directors very proud and the students dreamy. Now, let’s hope that the next generation will also be glad to be part of the great adventure of La Grande Ecole du Droit!
– Julien Blavot-Goujon, member of the 2016 organization team
At the end of the day, the task left was maybe the most important. Maître Baller and the juries gathered in a room where they exchanged their views and finally, 30 names emerged.
We look forward to meeting them and we hope they enjoyed the experience as much as we did. See you next year!
Organizing this day was our way to contribute to developing the Grande Ecole du Droit. The general mobilization shows how committed every student is to improve the quality of our formation.
– Hortense Derrien, leader of the 2017 organization team
Part of the organization team (Claire-Emeline Auduc, Mathis Aubry—Lallement, Hortense Derrien, Flora Merret, Léa Jouannin)
NB: we would like to thank the university, Professor Magnier, Maitre Baller, Pierre Delassis and all the students (former and current) for coming and being so effective.
Claire-Emeline Auduc (GED2)